Search
 
Write
 
Forums
 
Login
"Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong; they are the ones to attain felicity".
(surah Al-Imran,ayat-104)
Image Not found for user
User Name: Noman
Full Name: Noman Zafar
User since: 1/Jan/2007
No Of voices: 2195
 
 Views: 1925   
 Replies: 0   
 Share with Friend  
 Post Comment  

Storm on the Horizon for Pakistan

August 6th, 2008 · Shaan Akbar

Summary
Today, Asif Zardari and Nawaz Sharif, chairmen of Pakistan's two largest parties agreed in principle to impeach President Pervez Musharraf. The agreement, however, is contingent on all coalition partners supporting the move. Just as there has been little-to-no "progress" on the reinstatement of the justices Musharraf sacked, it is just as unlikely that Musharraf will be sacked himself. This does not mean that Musharraf is not worried "” he just canceled his trip to China for the opening of the summer Olympics. Insider Brief sources are also indicating dozens of active and retired military officials have been rushed into Islamabad for emergency meetings.

What's the Rush, Mr. Zardari?
So why the sudden anxiousness on Zardari's part to move negotiations forward with Sharif and impeach Musharraf? There are two, contrasting explanations. The first is desperation. After his failed attempt to gain control of the ISI as well as ISI efforts to undermine his government (for the purposes of maintaining a political stalemate), Zardari is now attempting to go after Musharraf. President Musharraf still represents the military's institutional foothold in politics. The second explanation could be that Zardari has received US approval and backing for his actions after potentially convincing the current administration that Musharraf is what stands in the way of effective anti-Taliban operations in Pakistan. The second explanation is less likely however, as it was the current government that immediately and repeatedly sought to negotiate with the "Pakistani Taliban" from a position of weakness.

Regardless of his reasons, Zardari faces a major hurdle - the Army. Despite stepping down as Army Chief, Insider Brief sources report that the Pakistan Army remains very loyal to the President and is willing to go to bat for his political survivial, especially against the likes of Zardari. This brings us to the crux of this post.

The Coming Storm
The weight of recent events, shifting attitudes, and intense internal and external pressure on Pakistan are such that things can no longer continue as they have been. From our perspective at the Insider Brief, something has to give and it will undoubtedly be in the form of radical, tumultuous change in the near-to-medium term. Consider the following:

  • The present civilian government (read: Zardari and co.) has picked a needless fight with the Army over the ISI and lost. It is yet again picking a needless fight against President Musharraf; a fight that will ultimately lead to another confrontation with a pro-Musharraf military.
  • Insider Brief sources let slip that if things continue on their current trajectory, the military may be forced to (reluctantly) re-take the driver's seat.
  • Insider Brief sources also report that discontent is growing within the Army against its chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani. He is increasingly being perceived as an American lackey from within the ranks.
  • Pakistan's government and military have been unable to effectively roll back a raging Taliban-led insurgency in its northwest. This is moving beyond a crisis of governance into a crisis of existence.
  • US and US-allied forces are preparing to conduct larger, more overt military action in Pakistan and have already openly admitted to conducting air strikes on Pakistani territory.
  • The CIA publicly identified the ISI as having a hand in the recent bombing of the Indian Embassy in Kabul.
  • Sources further indicate that there is a common perception within the Pakistani military that the US is colluding with the Indians to foment trouble in Balochistan and Pakistan's northwest.
  • Intermittent hostilities have broken out between India and Pakistan on the Line of Control in Kashmir after 5 years of peace.
  • Public discontent is being compounded by a slowing economy and food and oil inflation.

Pretty picture, right? It depicts how unsustainable the current state of affairs is.

Ultimately, we're witnessing a web of competing interests intersect and conflict in a big way. At the center of it all is the Pakistani military establishment. It currently finds itself in conflict with the US, India, the Pakistani civilian government, insurgents and perhaps even itself. This is no fault of the military's "” this merely reflects the reality that the military is at the center of the Pakistani state. It is the only institution that is capable of holding Pakistan together as the country tears itself apart.

It would behoove the present elected government to work in lockstep with the military, instead of engaging it and other parties in petty power struggles. The reinstatement of sacked judges or Musharraf's impeachment will not save Pakistan. That will instead be determined by how Pakistanis and their leaders come together as a nation.


NW Pakistan 'On the Brink of Civil War'
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
By Shaheen Buneri

Pakistani mourners carry the national flag-draped coffin of a police officer, killed in a weekend bomb blast in Swat valley, where Pakistani troops are battling Islamic militants. (AP Photo)
Peshawar, Pakistan (CNSNews.com) "“ Pakistan's military claims to have killed at least 94 Taliban militants in stepped-up operations in the North West Frontier Province's Swat valley, following the collapse of a truce.
 
Amid reports that the militants are trying to get reinforcements into the affected area from neighboring tribal regions, the Taliban has denied the casualty claim, saying on the contrary that it had killed 70 security force members in a week of fighting, while sustaining only nine losses.
 
The military action was launched after Islamic militants last week attacked security checkpoints and killed three intelligence officials. More than 20,000 troops are reported to be involved in the fighting, targeting forces loyal to the Swat-based radical cleric, Maulana Fazlullah, head of the Swat faction of the umbrella Pakistan Taliban Movement or TTP.
 
Army Brig. Zia Anjum Bodla told reporters in Swat that the Taliban had repeatedly violated a peace agreement signed last May with the NWFP government. The military action would continue until the area was cleared of insurgents.
 
"This time we will fight decisively to achieve our ends," he maintained.
 
Bodla said apart from the enemy casualties, at least 15 security forces and 28 civilians had also been killed.
 
The provincial government negotiated a peace agreement because, it said, a military-driven strategy to restore calm to that area had failed "“ a view shared by the national government in Islamabad. But the U.S. and Afghan governments and NATO officials in Kabul say peace deals in the tribal and border areas have merely worsened security inside Afghanistan, while doing little to curb violence on the Pakistan side of the border either.
 
Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan contested the military casualty figures, and vowed that the fighting would continue.
 
"[The] NWFP government has deceived us by launching the military operation and we will avenge it for this. It is following Washington's policies but we will continue to fight against United States both in Pakistan and Afghanistan," he said by phone from the Matta area.

A Pakistani security guard stands beside an anti-Taliban poster put up by a Karachi citizens' group on Aug. 4, 2008. The group is warning citizens to be aware of the growing influence of Taliban in Karachi. (AP Photo)
Inhabitants of the affected areas say that because of the influx of security forces into Matta, a TTP stronghold about 110 miles from Peshawar, Taliban fighters have started moving to other areas.
 
"They are in the mountains and they are in the villages among the civilian population," said Matta resident Khan Nawab, who also voiced concern about the army tactics.
 
"The military is using gunship helicopters to flush them away but sometimes it kills more civilians than the Taliban," he said. "It creates resentment among the local population and the government should consider this issue seriously."
 
Under the peace agreement signed on May 21, the Taliban demanded the implementation of Islamic law in the area incorporating Swat, and the withdrawal of security forces and police from the valley.
 
It also expected the release of 19 Taliban fighters, and when this did not materialize, it intensified attacks against security personnel.
 
Girls' schools were also targeted by the militants, who view education for girls as un-Islamic. The NWFP ministry of education reports that at least 58 girls' schools had been attacked or torched.
 
"I fail to understand how you can sign peace with a group that is adamant on bringing destruction to the region and its people," said Zia-ud-Din Yousafzai, a political analyst based in Swat.
 
He said this was the government's last chance to put an end to the violence.
 
"We are virtually at the brink of a civil war," Yousafzai said. "It the military fails to curb militancy then I fear people themselves will fight for their survival. They have no other choice."
 
Taliban sources said Fazlullah has asked TTP leaders in neighboring tribal areas "“ the Mohmand and Bajaur agencies of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) "“ to send fighters to help in the fight against security forces in Swat.
 
District officials in Swat, however, said security along roads leading to the valley had been tightened. At least 30 suspected militants heading for Swat had already been captured by the security forces, they said.
 No replies/comments found for this voice 
Please send your suggestion/submission to webmaster@makePakistanBetter.com
Long Live Islam and Pakistan
Site is best viewed at 1280*800 resolution