Search
 
Write
 
Forums
 
Login
"Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong; they are the ones to attain felicity".
(surah Al-Imran,ayat-104)
Image Not found for user
User Name: International_Professor
Full Name: International Professor
User since: 22/Jan/2008
No Of voices: 353
 
 Views: 5331   
 Replies: 0   
 Share with Friend  
 Post Comment  

Bacha Khan and anti-Pakistan role of his legacy against Pakistani’s

 By International Professor

 

 There is no doubt that current Government of NWFP ruled by Awami National Party is taking revenge from the Pashtoon citizens of Pakistan for their defeat in creation of Pakistan. Today all fascists who are busy in pushing army against citizens of Pakistan had any answer that why not a single reporter, columnist or anchor dare to take name of known Russian, communists, India agents or representatives of Northern Afghan Alliance in Pakistan.

All fascists including two mouth nchors of Geo TV, Dunya TV, Dawn TV, ARY TV, Aaj TV, Samaa TV and Salman Taseer media are mum that on what grounds an established anti-Pakistan party became champion whereas all other patriotic Pakistani’s have been labeled as terrorists or extremists. The involvement of defunct National Awami Party in politics with a new label of Awami National Party in terrorism is widely known and their heinous activities are scattered on the pages of history, every day bomb blasts and acts of terrorism with the help of KGB and Khad is an integral part of their violent history. Gen Kiyani invaded on the peoples of Swat and Malakand on the advice of pro-Pakhtonistan mafia, and started massacre indiscriminately.

Bacha Khan’s real name was Abdul Ghaffar Khan, who liked to be called as Gandhi. In 1948 he founded Peoples Party at Karachi which was banned by Government.  In 1957 he again founded National Awami Party (NAP) which was also banned by courts in famous Hyderabad case, and interestingly whole case against NAP was represented by ISI in courts. Current ANP is same defunct NAP party and Wali Khan eldest son of Bacha khan became its leader.

Bacha Khan born 1890, was a companion of Haji Khan Tarangzai when he was young and energetic, who established round 75 Muddersah’s in 1911 at Sarhad. Those educational institutions were not only teaching centers but Jihadist centers as well. In 1924 Bacha Khan migrated to Afghanistan under Tehreek e Hijrat along with many other companions.  Generally Tehreek Hijrat was a very tough decision for those who left their homes and belongings; however it put long lasting effects on the history of Indo-Pakistan, and today’s liberal fascists and agents of imperialism are continuously bashing Tehreek e Hijrat since last 3-4 years on media. Their target is Ulema e Deoband and in particular Syed Ahmad Shaheed, who was behind this movement and during that period many Makhdoom's, Pirzada’s and Sahibzada’s particularly belonging to Sindh and Southern Punjab took advantage of Tehreek e Hijrat and established their links with English Sarkar. Today’s all Gaillani’s; Qureshi’s, Bokhari’s, Syed’s, Naqvi’s and Kazmi’s were beggars to whom British Sarkar awarded lands and money in those days. Don’t go for away the grandfather and father of current Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gaillani were among those who were found sitting out sides offices of English civil servants with their peons on wooden benches to suck lands and show their subordination. Grandfather of Shah Mahmood Qureshi was against creation of Pakistan as well; moreover father and uncles of Abida Husain and Fakhar Imam were awarded lands on 99 years lease for dogs and horse breeding etc. Bacha Khan finally returned from Afghanistan, however during Tehreek e Hijrat almost all Maddarsah’s of Haji Tarangzai were abolished.  Then he joined Caliphate Committee and worked for that movement devotedly.

If you may read biography of Bacha Khan and his companions, so it does not have any difference in essence from the current role of majority of Pashtoon against American imperialism, however at that time their target was British Government. And peoples like Bacha Khan and Mulla Omar are metaphor of resistance against imperialism in different periods of history. Asfandyar Wali, the grandson of Bacha Khan and peoples around him who claimed to be communist has a reason, in particular their anti-imperialistic genes. But I think today blood of Bacha Khan has become so thin that his grandson is showing subservient to imperialists. After allying with Washington, those declared them secularist, non-religious or pro-American etc.

Then by reading only and only biography of Khan Abdul Ghaffar khan, a person has no choice except to consider him as an orthodox Muslim, a religious person or a Wahabi. Word Wahabi was a label which was given to all those anti-British peoples who were struggling for independence in those days. Whereas anti-Wahabi was grabbing lands and busy in appointments of their relatives on higher civil posts in British Raj. According to my knowledge Wahabi was a political label then religious one. Reshmi Romal (Handkerchief) movement and persecution of Pir Sibghat Ullah, the father of current Pagara mafia, Caliphate movement, imprisonment of religious scholars at Kala Pani, all of those were all blamed to be anti-imperialists. So word Wahabi shakes the feudal lords, imperialists and fascists.

Interestingly Abdul Jabbar Khan the younger brother of Bacha khan married to a white lady at England. In 1930 Bacha Khan started Khudai Khidmatgar movement. In 1931 he joined hands with Indian National Congress: and in 1934 along with his brother Dr. Khan Sahab both succeeded in access to Gandhi. In 1937 his party got 19 seats out of 50 seats in Sarhad. During movement of independence he remained faithful to Indian Congress: during elections of 1946 he was elected to central Indian legislative Assembly. His movement remained restricted till 1954. However he was allowed to attend parliament sessions.

Later he started anti-One Unit movement and his own brother Dr. Khan Sahab arrested him in 1956. He was against two nation theory and always worked as staunch ally of Indian Congress after independence. Then he started Pakhtonistan movement and left Pakistan, and from Radio Kabul he propagated anti-Pakistan speeches and kept leading Pakhtoonistan movement.

Bacha Khan did not condemned Soviet invasion and stay committed with Indian embassy at Kabul, he was also against Mujahedeen during soviet occupation.  He went to India in 1987 and collected billion of rupees. However he fell ill and came to Pakistan but he announced from his death bed that he would not like to be buried in a slave country of Pakistan. So when he died on Jan 22, 1988 his coffin was taken to Jalalabad, Afghanistan for burial. He had two wives.

Anti-Pakistan role: Afghanistan was the only country which opposed the creation of Pakistan. Dr. Khan Sahab Abdul Jabbar Khan born in 1882, he remained companion of his brother Bacha Khan in all of his political activities. He was successful in 1937 elections and appointed as Chief Minister Sarhad, in 1946 he was re-elected and re-appointed at the same post. When referendum for Pakistan was held, he tried hard to take advantage of his post in anti-Pakistan conspiracies. When peoples of Sarhad rejected their anti-Pakistan stance, still he refused to resign from the post of Chief Minister. On Aug 14, 1947 he was on his post, and refused to participate in independence ceremonies. Later he was removed from the post but he rejoined cabinet as a minister of communication in 1954. When one unit was implemented he was the first Chief Minister of West Pakistan. Finally he joined hands with Sikandar Mirza and kept foundation of Republican Party. Here another part of Pakistan history starts, leaders of Muslim League who joined hands with dictators remained attach to Convention Muslim League or Council Muslim Leagues. Z A Bhutto who was a product of that polluted Mulsim League and his strings were controlled by descendent of Mir Jaffer, Sikandar Mirza and his Iranian wife Naheed later caused in dividing Pakistan.

In above stated time span scenario a person Faqir of Ipi got lot of femme. He had traditional Pashtoon anti-Imperialists stance. Maddersah, Jahad and Islam are basic weapons of that area. Difference between struggle of Bacha Khan and Faqir of Ipi according to history could be defined as that Faqir of Ipi was believer of spirituality, where as Bacha Khan and Faqir of Ipi both were anti-Imperialism and strict Mujahideen.

Mr. Hamid Mir blamed in his column published in Daily Jang that Faqir of Ipi was agent of Russia. In those days everyone against British Imperialism was pro-Russia, pro-Germany or pro-Italy. After independence role of Bacha Khan was openly against creation of Pakistan, in the same scenario role of Faqir of Ipi has different significance, both were hopeless and disturbed by watching role of central government in the hands of Anglo-Indian type bureaucrats and politicians. Hamid Mir’s allegation some others have denied, as there is no historical or academic value most columnists of media have, as their way of writing speaks that those believe on propaganda, and try to address authorities for future benefits, oe make happy to influential groups and characters. It is history of Hamid Mir that he jumps to change sites, recently he remained busy in bashing Ulema e Deoband, Jihad and Wahabi’s. I don’t say that Ulema e Deoband or Taliban are angels but by eliminating anti-Pakistan role of Bacha Khan, Wali Khan and Awami National Party or by not talking about any word about two Shia political parties who contested elections against Quaid e Azam from Bombay constituency, or by not talking about relations of Khad, KGB and Raw with Wali Khan group, what would you call it propaganda or not on behest of anyone. In my opinion all national caliber leaders deserve respect and at this stage beating drums and siding with other groups look like hypocrisy. Role of Bacha Khan, JUH, Shia Political Party, JI, Shia Board and almost 80% feudal Pir’s who did not left India after independence or were against creation of Pakistan must be treated with equal status. Faqir of Ipi was a target of Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan, who propagated against him. It is bad luck of FATA and other leaders of tribal areas that those did not give attention to media and communications, their representatives deliberately kept the areas under darkness, so nobody knows what those actually desire, I have no doubt on their patriotism and faith.

For the information of Hamid Mir, Aamir Mir, Najam Sethi, Ahmad Rashid, Saleem Shahzad, Hasan Askari Rizvi, Hussain Haqqani and many others who poses them expert of Taliban, Al Kaeda, Jihadis and Afghanistan in front of Western media, probably do not know brought up of Pashtoon, which is quite different from Punjabi and Sindhi peoples. Anti-Imperialism is in their blood, so when British raj with the help of Makhdoom’s and Pirzada’s started to label all anti-British Raj peoples as Wahabi’s, so ultimately most Pashtoon fell under label of Wahabi. Those have nothing to do with Saudi Wahabi’s, however more orthodox like Wahabi’s. Difference between Sufi imperialism and Wahabi movements is largely dependent on collection of lands for former group and trust on God for later. That is why Sufi group is richest mafia of Pakistan. Almost 95% Sufi’s are feudal.

Interesting point to think patiently is role of current imperialist powers. In fact those are against Saudi Wahabi’s, creation of Shia crescent and survival of Hizbollah in Lebanon is part of their strategy to ruin Saudi Arabia. So those have hired Hussain Haqqani, Hasan Askari Rizvi, Najam Sethi and Zardari type neo-Shia’s to implement their agenda and continuously propagate against Wahabi’s Anglo-Americans are so fascist that those killed one million Iraqi’s to install a Shia puppet.  I don’t think all killed were Sunnis; almost 50% were poor Shia’s of Iraq. It is not too for that in Pakistan, Anglo-Americans who have hired Brelvi Mullahs, MQM, ANP and PPP, those will not ask for their blood, revolution requires blood, and permanent installation of Zardari and Gaillani type Irani Shia’s requires blood. So Faqir of Ipi and Bacha Khan were pro-Russia due to anti-Imperialism stance, even representatives of Mussolini and Hitler came over in asking for help from Pashtoon peoples. The role of Gen Kiyani is typical Punjabi role model which Punajb had been playing since centuries; being Iranian descendent he has specific Iranian mentality as well, which Zardari, Gaillani, Shah Mahmood Qureshi and many other Makhdoomzada’s also have. It is an entire separate topic so that will be represented next time.

Role of descendents of Bacha Khan is under discussion, those borrowed secularism from Indian National Congress, their meaning of secularism is based on anti-Pakistan theory, the two nation theory. Moreover Wali Khan Group remained involved in terrorism with the help of Khad, Raw and KGB. Those are pioneers in most of the bomb blasts and acts of terrorism throughout Pakistan with the help of pro-Russian Kabul Government. Whenever Indian Congress came into power, it enhances wave of terrorism in Pakistan.

Majority of leaders or sympathizers of ANP are product of Muddersah’s, their propaganda against Muddersah’s has political rivalry. If those claim to be irreligious that is also wrong because most Pashtoon culturally depend on religion. How cruelly ANP treated peoples of Sawt and Malakand, murdered by the hands of Pak army is a stigma on their Pushtoonhood. ANP is revenging peoples for helping in Afghan Jihad, because Afghan Jihad stopped their permanent source of income from Russia, and supporters of Afghan Jihad started to play with dollars. Now when Asfandyar Wali has a backing of CIA and MI 6, and flow of dollars have been started, one foot of all top leaders of ANP could be seen at New York other at London and third at Singapore.  So meanings of Jihad have been changed with Crusade, Muddersah’s have been replaced by Convents, Moscow has been replaced with Washington, logo of non-violence have been replaced with writ of Government, PPP is now their staunch ally which convicted them as terrorists and blamed for the killing of Hayat Mohammed Sherpao, this is same PPP which killed hundreds of Pashtoon at Liaqat Bagh Rawalpindi.

Today ANP is in power so everyone is trying to ignore their past, but believe as soon those will be out of power a new satanic circle of bomb blasts and killings will be restarted. Peoples who challenged feudal Khans are now labeled as Taliban and poor’s who challenged feudal in southern Punjab have been labeled as Lashkar e Jhangvi, poor’s who challenged Sardars in Baluchistan have been labeled as terrorists. Sky is laughing on Pakistani media that established Indian agents like ANP and MQM are posed as patriot, established agents of CIA , MI 6, RAW, MOSSAD and Khad are now patriots, what kind of joke is this. Who is Kiyani and Shuja Pasha, who is Zardari mafia, who were Minallah and Aitzaz Ahsan, who is behind Syed Saleem Shahzad, Hussain Haqqani, Mohammed Ali Durrani and Irshad Ahmad Haqqani , whether all of those were not on pay role of Jamat e Islami a few years back, ask them why those left Jamaat and now who is behind them. There are hundreds of examples and  thousand of snakes who are biting peoples of Pakistan.

Rustam Khan Mehmand says in an article:

Quote: In neighboring Afghanistan, Pakhtoon villages are being systematically demolished; their men, women and children are dying every day like cattle or, worse still, like flies. It is a Pakhtoon genocide. Their economy is in ruins, their homes broken, their families shattered, their future uncertain and their present as bleak as it can get. In the tribal areas they are being bombed and struck every second day with missiles, as if they are all enemies. In Karachi, the biggest Pakhtoon city, they are periodically picked up and brutally killed, with no questions asked. Politics is more sacrosanct than the lives of ordinary mortals in the Land of the Pure. The launching of the latest operation by the government smacks of the same hypocrisy, double standards and lack of foresight that has characterized our policy formulation in the last 60 years.

The interregnum between the signing of the agreement and the approval of the president to sign Nizam-e-Adl into law was utilized for creating hype, for painting a dreadful scenario of the implications of implementing the act. A deliberate mindset of phobia was created. It was not, for instance, explained to the people and to the world that the government is only re-enacting a law that was adopted by the governments of Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif.

When there was no countrywide criticism of the act, then why was a storm being created now? And when the law was extended finally there was a lukewarm attitude towards putting in place an infrastructure to implement the act. That was partly deliberate and partly reflected the incompetence of the authorities. Just as the act was extended in 1994 and in 1999 and not allowed to take practical shape, it was presumed that the act would remain a document on paper and it would be business as usual. This approach failed then, and it didn't quite work out this time.
It was not realized that merely calling a judge a qazi does not make him competent for administration of a totally different legal system.
The uncertainty produced serious doubts in the minds of the Nizam-e-Shariat and Taliban leaders. Strangely, the implications of such a stupendous operations were overlooked. And then there was inexplicable and heavy reliance on air action--use of aircraft and gunships to bomb, rocket and shell villages which were being flattened. Hundreds of innocent civilians having been killed and hundreds of thousands having been forced to leave their homes. What a price to pay for peace!
That the whole operation was timed to coincide with the president's visit so the US adds another sinister dimensions to the government policy.
Do we establish the "writ" of the government by causing the displacement of 1.5 million peaceful citizens? Pakhtoons on both sides of the divide are paying a colossal price for not being "on board" and not being conformists; and this while they don't have any leadership worth the name. Genuine leaders would stay with their people and share with them their agonies and sufferings rather than choosing to stay away in such critical times in the history of Pakhtoons. Unquote:
http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=180348

Conclusion: In current American war of terror only Pashtoon are extremists, terrorists, Taliban or Wahabi. Zardari and Kiyani have used ANP as a tool, and it is not too for that ANP which is a known terrorist’s mafia would be found standing in queue of Taliban, whether anybody thinks that so called Taliban are motherless Childs? Or peoples killed by army with jets and helicopters had no family back ground? Don’t forget tribal culture and role of Pushtoon since last many centuries. Zardari type thugs who are thinking to make Pakistan monarchy of Hakim Ali Zardari by appointment of Bilawal and Asifa on higher posts would be a dream after current invasion of army on innocent citizens. Beggars of Multan area like Gaillani, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Hamid Saeed Kazmi or other Makhdooms and Sahibzadas have no moral courage to stand in front of victimized peoples.

ANP will be biggest losers; a few dollars would be disappeared soon including amounts given by India to Bacha Khan. Zardari is a snake which always bites on the heel. Read carefully columns of CIA and ISI agents, those have started campaign to emerge Kiyani as next ruler of Pakistan, especially Irshad Ahmad Haqqani of world bank, Ayesha Ijaz Khan of MI 6, Farhat Taj Andersen of Khad and Najam Sethi agent of ISI and RAW, Haroon Rashid of Sunni Tehreek and Ayaz Amir of ISI etc.

Character of Pak army and patriotism: CIA-ISI-RAW sisters joined hands in intelligence sharing
May 22, 2009:  WASHINGTON: Pakistan and India have started sharing intelligence as part of an unprecedented cooperation effort between the longtime nuclear-armed foes overseen by the United States, US media reported on Thursday. The Wall Street Journal said the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) arranged for the two South Asian nations to share information on the Pakistan-based LeT, widely accused of plotting the November attacks in Mumbai that killed 166 people. The arrangement has also applied to intelligence sharing on Taliban commanders who are leading a mounting insurgency against the Pakistani government. “We have to satisfy the Mumbai question, and show India that the threat is abating,” an official involved in Washington’s South Asia strategy told the newspaper. An official at ISI said India and Pakistan had shared “a lot” of information about the Mumbai attack and were now working directly with one another, while keeping the CIA informed. Although, Washington is not “under any illusions” about erasing longstanding suspicions between the two countries, it does see some progress, a US official told the journal

 No replies/comments found for this voice 
Please send your suggestion/submission to webmaster@makePakistanBetter.com
Long Live Islam and Pakistan
Site is best viewed at 1280*800 resolution