US Terror Attack on Libya: How CIA managed to Fool UNSC and World?

Notorious UNSC & Western Fascism over Sovereign Libya

(PART TWO)

 -DR. ABDUL RUFF

______________

Anti-Islamic media in the world, especially the India variety, have no proper understanding about the differences between UN and UNSC. They blast the “breaking-news” lying that UN has approved the no-fly-zone over sovereign Libya. This lies is a deliberate attempt to mislead the people about notorious UNSC. Now only the UNSC has informally decided to do all illegal operations, as usual, over sovereign Libya- and not the UN general assembly which is not even officially aware of the issue. The UNSC has backed a no-fly zone over Libya and "all necessary measures" short of a terror attack or invasion "to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas". They seek immediate “ceasefire” in Libya but have not yet decided to withdraw their rebel forces from Libya.

The informal decision of the notorious UNSC, the strongest composite terrorist organization (CTO) illegally imposing no-fly -zone over sovereign Libya is a latest western shame  and the expose of Western beggar states getting bribes from abroad to make their own regimes is also shamefully  illegal. It is the overt expression of a panicky stricken western world that has been fooling the world by creating illusions about democracy and regime change meant actually to control the energy and other resources through military terror attacks directly and through terror bases already established by the CIA-Pentagon duo across the globe.

West wants Libya not to attack the pro-west rebels who re destabilizing Libya. With a view to quelling the CIA engineered rebellion, the Libyan forces loyal to Col Qaddafi reportedly launched their first air attacks on Benghazi, targeting the airport at Benina. The Libyan military earlier warned that any foreign operations against Libya would expose all maritime and air navigation in the Mediterranean Sea to danger. Before the resolution was put to vote, the USA-UK-France trio has taken all precautionary measure to see none opposes it.

CIA-USA knows how to proceed to implement its conspiracies and where to put pressure for getting the resolution passé and got what it wanted. These three rouges states should have voted against the resolution but have been bribed by the other western rouge states.

CIA had devised a multi-pronged strategy to target Libya. Using global terrorist media (GTM) to write filth about Libyan leader Col. Qaddafi, calling him tyrant and dictator, etc; corner the Arab state that supported  on its Sept-1 hidden agenda to continue support against Libya too; employ the opposition o occupy oil fields and attack the  state employees and establishment. Then, before going for UNS resolution for noflyzone gimmicks, USA tried to coerce both Russia and China to play second fiddle to western anti-Islamic agenda which is common agenda fall these terrocracies.  They achieved most of it obviously at a price.

There is no difficulty for CIA in fooling the Libyan opposition and other anti-social elements. Obviously, the fascist organization called CIA has well in advance created a wide network of anti-Libya insurgents to help the western rouges to somehow enter Libya and do whatever they want threat will, including slaughtering of Muslims. With the object in mind the West has created a so-called National Transitional Council (NTC) ostensibly to take over from Col Qaddafi if at all… The Libyan opposition also has been misled by the promises made by the western democrats.

The Transitional Council is composed of senior officials of the old regime who turned their backs on Qaddafi in response to the shift by the imperialist powers. Military intervention in Libya, whose energy resources have been made the object of imperialist intrigues for decades, is being used both to secure access to oil and to contain the revolutionary movements in the region.

There is no difficulty in bring the Arab nations into US schema of things. The Arab League more often than not promotes western culture and religions, is itself composed of a collection of self-centered dictatorships, monarchies and emirates that in no way represent the desires or interests of the Arab people. Arab rogues are offering some scope for western occupation of Mideast as well.

USA is pushing the Arab customers of arms and other terror equipment to spare the jet warplanes they have now for a war over Libya. There has been surge in arms stockpiling in Mideast. According to a report Saudi Arabia recorded $1.5 billion in arms imports in the past two years, Algeria had $1.9 billion, Turkey $1.1 billion, UAE $1 billion, Egypt $855 million and Iraq $851 million. Israel recorded $191 million in arms imports. USA has brought several Arab nations closer to NATO and terror operations. In 2004 as per Istanbul Cooperation Initiative (ICI) in Turkey, the NATO established “new” bilateral partnerships with 6 Gulf Cooperation Council members Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, now the pro-Western regimes. The governments of the Middle East and North Africa dug deep into their pockets last year to stock up on weapons.

 In September the all powerful USA had struck deals to provide four members of the Gulf Cooperation Council - Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Oman - with $123 billion worth of arms in a dramatic move to confront Iran in the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia accounts for over half the total, $67 billion for 84 F-15 jets, 70 Apache gunships, 72 Black Hawk helicopters, 36 light helicopters and thousands of laser-guided smart bombs, the largest weapons deal in U.S. history. Even before those transactions are finalized, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute documented last December that Washington accounted for 54 percent of arms sales to Persian Gulf states between 2005 and 2009 and France 21 percent.

As a tactful western operation, the UK, France and Lebanon proposed the nonsensical UNSC Resolution No. 1973, with US support.  Generally, both USA-UK terror twins join in floating any anti-humanity UN resolution, but now an innocent looking B. Obama wants to show he is not entirely with Cameron, but he spoke to all western terror leaders on the future operations.  In New York, the UNSC voted 15-10, with five abstentions for mischievous reasons, including Brazil and India- both making strenuous terror efforts to obtain a veto from the USA-UK terror twins. Russia and China - which often oppose the use of force against a sovereign country as it sets a dangerous precedent and repulsive and backfiring - abstained rather than using their power of veto as permanent members. After all, the USA-UK-France and other warmongers and beggar terrocracies would terror attack even these two nations in due course. Germany, which abstained, will not be contributing to the military effort.  While, as permanent members of the council, both Russia and China had the power to defeat the resolution by casting “no” votes, they chose not to do so, ensuring that the UN continued to fulfill its function as a rubber stamp for the demands of the major imperialist powers.

China’s ambassador Li Baodong, the acting president of the UNSC voiced reservations about sanctions and noflyzone, but then justified Beijing’s failure to veto the measure by invoking the vote last weekend of the Arab League calling on the UN to implement a no-fly zone. In their statements explaining their abstentions, however, the ambassadors of the five countries made clear that the impending attack on Libya has nothing to do with any consensus by the “world community” to protect the Libyan people, but rather is the outcome of a conspiracy worked out in secret between Washington, London and Paris.

Thus, the “rebellion or uprising, or whatever you name it, has a thoroughness about its organization- after all the CIA does not play cricket but hardcore terror politics to swindle energy and other resources. America has gone about it thoroughly from all sides, employ disgruntled opposition and other anti-social elements and also enveloping even other Arab nations to destabilize Libya.  On top it, CIA takes care the rebellion is seen only as local struggle for freedom and not to be seen as if some foreign intelligence outfits are behind the “uprisings”.   

The so-called National Transitional Council, promoted jointly by US-UK-France  terror trio  aiming at oil resources have shamelessly not only guaranteed international oil companies unhindered exploitation of the country’s mineral wealth, but also called for the bombing of their own country. If some Americans, Englishmen or Frechese do the same, will these terrocracies keep silent?

Now the self-centered Kremlin, which indirectly supported the resolution by   keeping its self away from voting, regrets its hypocrisy and the NATO military operations over sovereign Libya. If Russia is sincere in what it says, then, it must stop western crimes in Libya and Mideast, before it is late.