UN climate talks in Germany!
-Dr. Abdul Ruff
____________
The goal of any climate talk is a deal that
will save Earth's climate from potentially catastrophic damage by heat-trapping
fossil-fuel gases. UN climate talks resumed in Bonn, Germany on 01 June, tasked
with sculpting a historic deal on greenhouse gases due to be sealed in Paris
little more than six months from now. The 10-day conference was opened by
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, who will steer the Paris talks. Topping
the agenda is how to trim a sprawling draft text into something manageable. At present, the document is an 80-page
compendium of national viewpoints, some of which overlap while others are in
clear conflict.
The aim is to present an agreement which
will save the Earth's climate from damage by heat-trapping fossil fuel gases.
The accord would commit the member states to restrict emissions and help poorer
countries which are threatened by drought, flood and rising seas.
A report presented to a UN climate
conference in Germany warns that global warming limit of 2 degrees Celsius is not
safe enough and proposes a new target of 1.5 degrees. Many developing nations
favour setting a ceiling of 1.5°C above pre-industrial times, arguing that
their economies are vulnerable to impacts such as storms, floods, droughts and
sea level rise. Collin Beck,
representing the Solomon Islands, said scientists should do more to examine
ways to set up a defence line against 1.5°C.
A study presented at United Nations climate
talks being held in Germany on June 02 said harmful impacts of global warming
such as heat waves and sea level rise are mounting and shows a need for a
"radical transition" to a greener economy. Damage is growing even
though average temperatures have risen only 0.85 degrees Celsius above
pre-industrial times, less than half the 2°C set as a maximum acceptable rise
by almost 200 nations.
The report, based on talks between experts
and governments, was presented the sidelines of June 1 to 11 talks on the Paris
accord, taking place in Bonn, Germany. All present at the unveiling of the report
said government promises so far for curbs on greenhouse gas emissions were too
weak to stay below the 2°C goal. The report also concluded that the 2°C goal
was too often wrongly viewed as an acceptable maximum, a 'guardrail' up to
which climate change would be manageable. Limiting global warming to below 2°C
necessitates a radical transition ... not merely a fine tuning of current
trends," according to the report.
The accord sought would be a binding deal
for more than 190 countries, to apply from 2020. Such a transition would mean
deep cuts in greenhouse gases, shifting from fossil fuels such as coal and oil
to renewable energies such as wind, hydro and solar power. But impacts of
climate change, such as damage to coral reefs or the melting of Greenland's ice
that is raising sea levels, showed risks were already increasing. Thomas
Stocker, a senior Swiss scientist from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, the climate science advisory body to the UN, said governments faced
tough choices in managing the risks of warming. "The elephant in the room
is what we can do to change the trend in emissions," he told delegates.
The draft text focuses on the need to limit
global warming to a maximum of two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit)
above temperatures from pre-industrial times. But some countries want to set
intermediate goals and only 38 countries - including the United States, the
European Union, Russia and Canada - have pledged curbs on emissions. Liz
Gallagher of campaign group E3G said: "It's not about just one plan, it's
a conversation that's taking place across governments, across civil society,
that says 'what's the vision for our country in 2050, what do we want to look
like?' The G7 summit being held in Bavaria on June 7-8 may also have a bearing
on the UN talks.
The draft text coalesces around the need to
limit warming to a maximum of two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) over
pre-industrial times. But beyond this, there are many areas of potential
discord. They include whether to set intermediate goals in emissions reductions
and stage regular meetings to press countries to deep their efforts, thus
ensuring the planet is kept on the path towards 2 C. On current emissions trends, say scientists,
the planet is on track for possibly 4.8 C of warming this century alone.
Taking effect from 2020, it would commit
the world community to roll back the emissions and help poor countries
threatened by worsening drought, flood and rising seas. But the process remains
scarred by memories of the last time the UN tried to forge an ambitious climate
deal. That occasion was in 2009, when a summit in the Danish capital nearly
became a fiasco. Leaders jetted in, expecting to bless a new treaty and instead
found utter deadlock.
So far only 38 UN parties have made pledges
to a roster of emissions curbs designed to be the Paris deal's big brake on
carbon. They include the United States, the European Union, Russia and Canada,
but so far not Japan, Australia, Brazil, India or China, the world's No. 1 emitter.
Despite this, many observers say they expect these major players to make their
submissions in the coming weeks or months. "I think we are finding that a
lot of the countries are just finding it's taking a bit more time than they
were going to do originally," said Liz Gallagher of campaign group
E3G. Climate talk is a conversation
that's taking place across governments, across civil society, which says
'what's the vision for our country in 2050?
The meeting will continue progress on
addressing the most effective ways to raise climate action before 2020, which
is when the new agreement would come into effect. Christiana Figueres,
Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change said a
group of stakeholders committing to long term emission reduction targets or
ambitious investments in renewable energies is emerging almost daily—building
confidence and a sense of ‘can do' among nations as we enter the final six
months of 2015".
The implementation of UN climate talks
depends heavily on the support of the world’s 7 largest economies. The G7
summit, taking place in Bavaria on June 7-8, may also have a bearing on the UN
climate talks. Rich countries are under pressure to explain how they will
implement their promise of mustering $100 billion (92 billion euros) a year in
climate finance by 2020. The world’s leading industrialized nations gave their
backing to a new global deal on climate change in 2015 after promises from the
United States at the start of the week galvanized flagging momentum. It said
the G7 nations — Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United
States — remained committed to low-carbon economies and limiting temperature
rises to two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the limit scientists
say can prevent the most devastating effects of climate change.
The United States' plan to cut emissions
from power plants by 30 per cent by 2030 prompted the European Union into a
defence of its own record. China, the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse
gases, also gave a hint that it would set some kind of cap on its emissions. In
a communiqué after summit talks in Brussels, the G7 leaders affirmed their
"strong determination" to adopt a new global deal in 2015 that is
"ambitious, inclusive and reflects changing global circumstances". The
communiqué also committed nations to announcing national contributions to
reducing emissions by the first quarter of next year, ahead of a Paris
conference on deciding a global deal in December 2015.
At the same time, the G7 offered the EU
support with its efforts to make its energy supplies more secure, promising to
"complement the efforts of the European Commission to develop emergency
energy plans for winter 2014-2015". In Europe, the quest for energy
security in the face of threats from Russia that it could disrupt supplies of
gas pumped through Ukraine, has knocked the climate debate down the agenda. But
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, in an address at the start
of the G7 summit, said the issues went "hand in hand".
Many EU nations say domestic, renewable
sources, such as solar and wind, can reduce the need for fossil fuel imports
from nations such as Russia. Of the G7 nations, Japan and Canada have pulled
out of the Kyoto process on tackling climate change. The United States signed
but did not ratify the original treaty.
Connie Hedegaard, the EU climate
commissioner, said the EU was still in the vanguard and would
"substantially over-achieve" its targets for cutting greenhouse gas
emissions by 2020, delivering more than its promised 20 per cent cut compared
with 1990 levels. "None of them wants to be perceived as the laggard,
which is a good thing," Alden Meyer, of the Union of Concerned Scientists,
said on the sidelines of preparatory talks for the 2015 deal in Bonn this week.
In addition to the plan to cut power sector
CO2 emissions by 30 per cent by 2030 from 2005 levels, the United States has an
existing national goal, set in 2009, to cut overall greenhouse gas emissions by
17 per cent below 2005 levels by 2020. This target is equivalent to 3.5 per
cent below 1990 levels — the UN benchmark year — after a sharp rise in
emissions in the 1990s. Following on from its 2020 goal, the EU is trying to
reach agreement on 2030 targets. In January, the EU executive put forward the
idea of a 40 per cent emissions cut by 2030 and in March EU leaders gave
themselves until October to agree on the target.
The world's richest countries, deciding on
all global issues, announced their strong determination to sign up to a global deal
on greenhouse gas emissions at the climate negotiations.
|