Search
 
Write
 
Forums
 
Login
"Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is good enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong; they are the ones to attain felicity".
(surah Al-Imran,ayat-104)
Image Not found for user
User Name: abdulruff
Full Name: Dr.Abdul Ruff Colachal
User since: 15/Mar/2008
No Of voices: 1852
 
 Views: 1801   
 Replies: 0   
 Share with Friend  
 Post Comment  

Will Afghanistan  be Free soon?

 Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

(Unstoppable Western Fascism in Afghanistan VIII)

 

[US-led NATO Axis Evil nations have so far not shown any inclinations to stop terror wars in favor of peace. All their actions indicate they want to escalate terror wars and kill more Muslims and squander the resources of Muslim nations. Reports indicate USA and Europe have secured major success in route clearance in Afghanistan and Af-Pak for energy corridor].

 

 

 

                                                     I

 

 

Even as the global state terrorists (GST) continue with their genocide spree in Islamic world , media reports suggest USA is trying to use its influence over Saudi Arabia to reach out to Taliban, ostensibly to transfer power to them as seek a safe exit from Afghanistan for US-led global state terrorists occupying Afghanistan for nearly 8 years killing over a million innocent Afghans, including children and women, in free for all hits, on fictitious pretext suggested by the Pentagon-CIA. Americans are keen to shield their own criminals-terrorists to return to their barracks without being killed by Afghans in retaliation for US democratic genocides.   Meanwhile, the NATO terrorists seem to have somehow managed a fraudulent poll in Afghanistan as Hamid Karzai has been declared president of Afghanistan, after election officials scrapped a planned second round of 7 November voting a day after Karzai's sole challenger, Abdullah Abdullah, pulled out of the race.

 

 

Like all illegal occupiers of alien lands, USA is also trying to defend its genocides of Muslims in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.  The Afghanistan war has become unpopular with the American public, with violence at the worst levels since U.S.-backed Afghan forces ousted the Taliban in 2001. Many of Obama's Democratic allies in Congress are wary of a troop increase, while Republicans accuse him of dragging out the deliberations over strategy and push for more of genocide under roguish Bushdom rules.  The western democracies seek immunity for their leaders from punishments.  

 

 

Several countries have benefited in many from the ongoing terror wars in Islamic world. Meanwhile as if they are going to make Afghanistan free form US-led terrorists, Russia, China and India said on 27 October that the world must remain engaged in Afghanistan, with Moscow seeking a greater role for regional powers in stabilising the war-torn country. The appeal by the three powers comes at a time when public support for the US-led NATO terror war in Afghanistan is fading in Western countries, and just as the USA is debating whether to send more troops to arrest a growing Taliban insurgency. They emphasised in a meeting in India the necessity of the international community maintaining its commitment to render assistance to the government and people of Afghanistan in ensuring security and development. Although they all aid the ongoing terror war in Afghanistan, they still say that the three countries were coordinating their efforts to restore stability to Afghanistan and "counter terrorism and drug trafficking" as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters. "We can not stand aloof and impartial on what's going on in the friendly neighbouring countries and adjacent countries too," Lavrov said.

 

For Russia and China, two veto members of notorious UNSC, it has always been business even while Western state terrorists are killing innocent Muslims in Islamic world and they support the NAYTO to take care of their trade interests in the region, though they know the NATO wars are illegal on few false assumptions of Obama. In fact UNSC-5 has accorded legitimacy for such lawlessness by super powers in exchange for other favours to both. It is fact some individuals cannot enter US airports to life planes to hit the targets of their choice. But selfish nations like Pakistan lend credibility to the illegal wars.   

 

 

Both India and China have made huge investments in Afghanistan. Russia as former occupier of Afghanistan still has some business and stake there. Russia insists on consultations with India and China which have a stake far longer term than many others. But any cooperation between India and China is limited by rising friction over a long-running border dispute, as also Chinese support for Pakistan which is competing for influence with India in Afghanistan. New Delhi is seeding Afghanistan with development projects worth $1.2 billion suit its stay and ensure energy routes apart from abeting its own brand terrorsmm in Afghanistan abd blame it on Islamists.

 

 

 

                                                  II

 

Pentagon-CIA control the course of terror wars in Afghanistan and elsewhere. U.S. strategy for Afghanistan, focused partly on Pakistan which Washington sees as a crucial ally to showcase dubious aims of GST in Islamic world, has largely ignored the concerns of regional countries such as India, China and Russia that claim to share security interests with Afghanistan. The Russians, who earlier shamelessly occupied Afghanistan and killed innocent Muslims, are asking to re-evaluate elements in the Af-Pak policy which, according to Moscow, have not worked such as over-reliance on Pakistani military, under-reliance on Afghan national army and deals with the Taliban. Russia wants USA to consult Moscow on Afghanistan.

 

On the face of it, the Obama administration has preferred to call the fa�ade of the terror occupiers of Islamic world a fine bluff. And, it seems the NATO terrorist gang is losing its ground gradually with President Obama kicking them back and forth refusing to oblige their troop requests even by creating all terror activities in Afghanistan and Pakistan, killing Muslims. The White House has said that it will take no decision on sending more troops to Afghanistan until it determines the new government is a "true partner". There are about 67,000 U.S. terror troops and 42,000 allied forces in Afghanistan. NATO chief terrorists Gen Stanley McChrystal, whom Obama snubbed  over demand for deployment of an additional 40,000 troops next year, is pestering Obama to add at least  10,000 to 15,000 troops as a face shaving formula.  Both state terrorists USA and UK, wholesale trouble shooters around the world,  are making all out efforts to obtain legitimacy for their genocides and terror destructions in Afghanistan and elsewhere  by putting in place a puppet regime in Kabul and Baghdad.

 

 

Afghan presidential challenger Abdullah Abdullah's exit from the Nov. 7 vote threatened to raise doubts about the legitimacy of Karzai's government. Karzai's camp ruled out a coalition with Abdullah, dashing hopes of a way out of the impasse. His voice faltering and his eyes welling with tears, Abdullah told hundreds of supporters, including white-bearded tribal elders, in a giant tent used for grand assemblies that he had reached the decision "in the interests of the nation". Whether or not his comment was a Hollywood performance or real � it does not matter. 

 

 

The question whether Afghanistan would be free from the GST occupation any time now is puzzling and troubling at the same time and would get rebounced with another set of question: what about Iraq and Pakistan? And what about Iran? Both pragmatists and realists who see the hidden agendas these rogue states have been pursuing would prefer to keep their mouth shut. After all the US-led NATO has not invaded these Islamic nations just for peace or democracy and their objectives are not entirely met thus far. 

 

Recently, the Nobel peace laureate US President Barrack Obama, who possibly has not understood that it was USA and its terror allies that converted the Muslims into militant category to defend their lands from the terror activities of occupying western rogue states led by USA. has reached out to the American terror forces (both men and women) occupying Afghanistan and killing the innocent Afghans for no logic except to reduce their population and defame Islam, and said that his decision to send an additional 40,000 troops to war ravaged Afghanistan will not be one done in haste. �I won't risk your lives unless it is absolutely necessary," Obama pledges to 3,000 marines, naval officers and their families who packed into an airplane hangar at the Naval Air Station here. President Obama seems worried only about the deaths of US state terrorists in Afghanistan, while they have already killed over a million Muslims in Afghanistan alone. Previously, the president has been briefed on the situation in Pakistan and Afghanistan by the U.S. chief terrorist commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal; he's spoken with members of Congress; and he's held six meetings with members of his administration, including with his national security team in the White House Situation Room. The president has signalled he could wait until after the war-torn country holds a presidential runoff election on November and is expected to make a decision on a new war strategy in coming weeks. Obama cannot ignore the waning American support for the terror war in Islamic world.

 

                                                 III

 

While US-led NATO rogue state terrorists have already killed over million Muslims in Afghanistan and more than that in Iraq, Russia, China and India have killed enough Muslims in their respective country. These tow semi-rogue states have not asked USA and other 42 plus Axis of evils to quit Afghanistan, because of their business interests and their own hidden agendas and all they want is a fair share in NATO booty.  

 

NATO chief terrorist Gen McChrystal, the US terror commander for state crimes in Afghanistan, has recommended sending the extra troops as the US reviews its strategy. Washington is debating a request for 40,000 more troops in Afghanistan. The US would want first to be sure that the Afghan government was capable of becoming a "true partner" able to govern the country. Emanuel said that the number of soldiers deployed in the country was secondary to whether or not they could work alongside an effective Afghan administration. They argue, USA does not have a credible Afghan partner for this process.

 

 

USA has converted Afghanistan a corrupt state, just as Iraq and Pakistan. Karzai insisted he won the 20 August vote but EU observers say that as many as one in four votes cast was suspicious. Results from an investigation by UN-backed Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC) into fraud claims in the Afghan presidential poll have become redundant now. Meanwhile, brother of Afghan President Hamid Karzai has been getting regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency. Ahmed Wali Karzai is a suspected player in Afghanistan's opium trade and has been paid by the CIA over the past eight years for services that included helping to recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the CIA's direction in and around the southern city of Kandahar, the newspaper reported. Ahmed Wali Karzai said he received regular payments from his brother, the president, for "expenses" but that he did not know where the money came from. Ahmed Wali said in an interview that he cooperates with U.S. civilian and military officials but does not engage in the drug trade and does not receive payments from the CIA, the Times said. The CIA neither confirmed nor denied the reported payments.

 

 

Deeply concerned only about thier business interests in Afghanistan, India, China and Russia, are only trying to send a signal that each had a stake in Afghanistan and that the USA couldn't continue to pursue a unilateral path. India seeks a fair share in Afghanistan resources at par with other occupying terror nations. The timing of the statement is significant because the Americans are now reviewing their war and it's a clear signal to the U.S. that it can not go it alone with its so-called Af-Pak policy. Russia is saying this can't be a bilateral thing between the U.S. and Pakistan because this concerns the core of other countries in the region and they have to be taken into account.

 

Russia is keen to get entry into WTO by servicing the NATO terrorists directly and through corrupt Central Asian nations under the indirect control of the Kremlin. No one therefore can assure the world of this trio collective wisdom and capability to free Afghanistan and stabilise Pakistan so that the region is tension free once again. When the entire Islamic world is watching the show without offering any serious resistance in some form, how could these basically anti-Islamic nations that have their own anti-Muslim agendas and killed thousands of innocent Muslims enmasse to strengthen their regimes, shield Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq? 

Failure to learn from previous mistakes could be disastrous for Muslim nations. Failure of Afghan ruling Taliban in foreseeing the future goals of anti-Islamic roguish nations led by USA on the one hand and former official Afghan occupiers of Russia on the other, and foolish actions of the regime in Afghanistan then led to the destruction of Afghanistan and murder of million innocent Afghans and this should be a reference to all Muslim states in the world, especially those who champion the cause of sovereignty and new states. Their pathetic knowledge of US-EU hidden agendas in Islamic world, contemporary intentional affairs, regional geo-political developments and poor competency in English language plus the incompetent media management could make the Muslims earn the mischievous title of �terrorists�. Islamic world is under surveillance of the notorious UNSC-5 and USA. Any slip in their actions thus could invite globalized terror forces under auspicious of notorious UNSC-5 to ruin them right in their own nations. All anti-Islam drogue states are protected against their illegal activities in Islamic world by their own dirty laws.

 

 

Did you, then, say Afghanistan will be Free sooner than later because of a new president in White House, but he allows to be effectively controlled by the notorious Pentagon? Many argue Americans have not elected Obama to if he were an honest arbiter of peace, after all Americans have not openly demonstrated anywhere in the US democracy against NATO terror occupation of Islamic world plus genocides of Muslims till today. Fascist Israel calculates that aspect in deciding on Palestine.

 

Or, are you crazy to think of a free Afghanistan now when Zardari regime permits murders of his people by foreign terrorists in NATO democracy uniforms? Why do you think NATO will vacate Afghanistan? In participating killing of Pakistanis inside Pakistan now, Indian hidden agenda to destabilize Pakistan has already begun to show results with nuclear US support with state terrorists killing Muslims in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  Many in India see the hand of Pakistan's military in these attacks. Islamabad considers Afghanistan a fall-back position in the event of war with India and has objected to New Delhi's growing presence in the country. India over-enjoys the continued genocides of Muslims in Pakistan.

 

(To Continue...>)

-----------------------

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Specialist on State Terrorism

Independent Columnist in International Affairs, Research Scholar (JNU) & the only Indian to have gone through entire India, a fraud and terror nation in South Asia.

 No replies/comments found for this voice 
Please send your suggestion/submission to webmaster@makePakistanBetter.com
Long Live Islam and Pakistan
Site is best viewed at 1280*800 resolution