Unstoppable Western Fascism in Afghanistan-I

On the fragile hopes that dollars and Euros can control the entire world, the terror military America is at an illegal, self destructive war by involving all anti-Islamc terror forces around the world under the notorious NATO, including Hindu Indian terrorists. USA led NATO invaded Afghanistan for replaying the Great game and not to promote nay democracy or safe guard the interests of Afghans against any enemy , but today the occupying US terrorists are the biggest enemy of Afghans. On the contrary, bulks of Afghans have been made corrupt and criminal minded now. How to win in Afghanistan? Or, the best approach to Afghan problem etc only means how to kill all Afghans as quickly as possible so that Afghanistan could be shared by all interested parties. The top commander in Afghanistan has called for a new terror strategy, and possibly more troops. All NATO/US terror strategies converge on just the issue of faster genocides of Afghans for no mistakes of theirs. NATO requires more troops to kill Musims, but they say protecting population centers requires more troops so control Kandahar to provide necessary enrgy route for the ANTO meber states and their terror allies.

Needless to say, the Pentagon’s terror strategy did not work, and the situation in both Iraq and Afghanistan has continued to worsen. No strategy other than immediate withdrawal from alien lands in a decent manner alone can work in Islamic world. How long can they fool the world? At the same time, three high profile polls show that the American public, long supportive of the military effort in Afghanistan, has had enough and is now firmly opposed to the conflict’s continuation. Though the war seems far from foremost in the minds of many voters right now, a further escalation could have political consequences down the road.

Afghanstan is under the US led NATO Axis of Evil forces. American fundamentals are in rubbish baskets being churned out by the roguish Neocons to give it a new shape and a new strategic value. But many do wonder whether the nearly eight-year-old war is still worth fighting at all and they suggest, though very nervous about terror reactions from the “democratic” NATO nasty media, quick withdrawal from Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan of all terror based NATO rogues. At least 93 people, mostly  civilians, died in the “democratic” NATO airstrike in northern Afghanistan Kunduz overnight. the air attack occurred as villagers arrived to take some of the fuel.

it's not currently visible to Afghans that NATO has decreased civilian casualties.The airstrike has almost destroyed rapport NATO has been trying to build mischeavoulsy One operation can ruin the entire positive image of NATO. Both US and Un are collabraitng their activities to the advantages of the Usa and Europe . The U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan said it sent a team to the strike site as well. As an immediate priority, everything possible must be done to ensure that people wounded by this attack are properly cared for, and that families of the deceased are getting all the help they need. However what the UN, controlled efeectivley by the NATO terror stalwarts would do remians to be seen.

On 2001, Oct. 7, the USA launched one of the most stunningly illegal terror military operations in its history. Just four weeks after self planted “terrorists” possibly with the help of some Muslim CIA agents directed from West and Israel killed nearly 3,000 people on “American soil”; Western and all other anti-Islamc media came alive to blast the Islamic “fundamentalism and terrorism” and made Christianity that colonized several nations and Judaism that captivated the Palestinians after annexing their lands illegally as the real peaceful religions. The NATO-US state terrorists struck Taliban government and the CIA inspired al-Qaeda targets with aircraft, missiles, and Special Forces soldiers. By early December, the Taliban was out of power, al-Qaeda had fled into the mountains, and victory was America’s and world had expected the NATO to return to their own terror breeding countries, but alas, they stayed on because their goal was not al-Qaeda and Talibans per se. but the energy routes surrounding Central Asia as well as establishing military bases.

But that was eight years ago. Did anyone expect back then that the Americans posing themselves to be the great democrats would still be in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan today, with more troops than ever? That is the genesis of regime change paradigm. The number of American military personnel has doubled in the past year, to more than 60,000. U.S. and NATO commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal submitted a "a revised implementation strategy” to Defense Secretary Robert Gates asserting that "success is achievable". The Washington Post reports that the U.S. would need a force of 100,000 to carry out a new strategy. But it seems 100,000 troops necessarily not enough at all and a special request for more troops would be submitted later and also later. . The surge strategy in Iraq required 160,000 U.S. military personnel—in a country with fewer people and a third less land area than Afghanistan. A recommendation from the Washington-based Center for American Progress calling for a renewed U.S. commitment says withdrawal might not be possible—until a decade from now.

All Neocon terror minded strategists argue that a pull out would force the innocent Americans soon be back where they we were on 2001, Sept 10 with the Taliban in control and al-Qaeda enjoying a refuge from which to launch attacks. In the name of safety and security, the USA is destroying the Islamic world one by one last one would perhaps be Saudi Arabia, the land where Islam took birth some fourteen hundred years ago.  Since NATO terror forces are already there in the Mideast region in plenty, destruction of Arab world would take much time. The terrorism specialists ask USA to officially invade Pakistan and stay on so that both Afghanistan and Pakistan could be handled better. The pre-paid Pakistani leaders, they say, might agree for that. The threat to Pakistan from Islamic extremists- and not from western Christian GSTs which is indeed real- is commonly offered as another rationale for our presence in Afghanistan. But as the NATO terror war has continued, Pakistan has grown less stable and more vulnerable and that is exactly what the USA wants to justify an official invasion.

Though new NATO  theater commander Stanley McChrystal has only recently submitted his strategic plan, the calls are growing for the U.S. to leave. The terror driven Noecons use the Pentagon to teroirze even the Americans and Europeans. They argue: Afghanistan couldn't again become a sanctuary for al Qaeda, that retreat from Afghanistan would be a strategic victory for jihadists, and that it would weaken our influence in Islamabad and perhaps threaten the stability of Pakistan itself as Islamists tried to turn the Pakistan military and population its way.

It is for President Obama who has inherited, unwillingly, the Bushdom terror legacy, to direct the Pentagon not stay in sovereign Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan there to engage in the costly and open-ended fictitious projects known as “nation-building”, or even to “defeat the extremists”. Today the human world is terribly terrorized by the Nato GSTs and even Americans feel the terror atmosphere around the world where they travel and because they know American terrorists are killing the defenseless Muslims without any justifications. Amid rising doubts about the wisdom of continuing that war nearly eight years after 9/11,  normal  Americans are increasingly opposed to the war, and prominent politicians and columnists are saying it is time to leave and redeploy our forces to focus on the real danger to the U.S., which is from al Qaeda. However,  NATO rogues make some defeats taking place so that they could kill more Afghans and show a looming U.S. defeat became a “victory”. This strategy is central to illegal occuaption. Evidence that President Hamid Karzai's allies stuffed ballot boxes have tarnished the recent Afghan election, U.S. casualties are rising, and the Taliban enemy seems increasingly menacing.

The diehard, deadly Neocon fanatics and former Bushdom rogues in media argue against any reduction in death tolls of Muslims in the occupied Islamic world.  Their message to the GSTs is clear: "You guys keep killing the bloody Afghans, Iraqis and Pakistanis and we will support you saying American democratic solders have killed the terrorists". Drones and special forces based offshore can contain the Zionist fascists and should be provided to the Palestinians. Why the NATO rogues hit Talibans when they have done noting wrong to the Americans? Why kill Muslims when they have not harmed sofar the geneuine interests of America? Illegal and unnecesary terror war to boost the image of Republican Party has to be stopped now. Now is the time for  Obama to give his generals some piece of peace advise they need to defeat the over-flatettered ego of Neocons, or leave and explain why he's concluded that Afghanistan is no longer worth the fight. President Obama should consider instituting Death Panels for trying the State Terrorists from all varieties of GSTs or ISTs!  

  -----------------------

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

Specialist on State Terrorism

Independent Researcher in International Affairs, The only Indian to have gone through entire India, a fraud and terror nation in South Asia.